<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoover S3765-040 WindTunnel Electronic Bagless Canister Vacuum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Jeffs</title>
		<link>http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum/comment-page-1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Jeffs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum#comment-51</guid>
		<description>This is an almost perfect product.  Only thing missing are a couple of small brushes I need.  Would buy it again in a heart beat.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an almost perfect product.  Only thing missing are a couple of small brushes I need.  Would buy it again in a heart beat.</p>
<p>Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandi L. Baird</title>
		<link>http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum/comment-page-1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandi L. Baird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I owned this vacuume cleaner for about 2 months and hated it every time I used it I finally sent it back to buy a Dyson.  It had great suction on hard floors but as soon as it hit carperting and you turned the brushes on they would quit spinning. I would have to hold the vacuume up a little so the brushes could spin and actually pick up dirt and pet hair but it took a toll on my back and a vacuume cleaner should not be that difficult to operate.  If the filters were not cleaned every time the canister was emptied it would lose a noticeable amount of suction.  I read many reviews about this product before I spent $250.00 on it and all the reviews were great until I bought it and now I am so glad I sent it back.  It was a total waste of money and my time even using the vacuume.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owned this vacuume cleaner for about 2 months and hated it every time I used it I finally sent it back to buy a Dyson.  It had great suction on hard floors but as soon as it hit carperting and you turned the brushes on they would quit spinning. I would have to hold the vacuume up a little so the brushes could spin and actually pick up dirt and pet hair but it took a toll on my back and a vacuume cleaner should not be that difficult to operate.  If the filters were not cleaned every time the canister was emptied it would lose a noticeable amount of suction.  I read many reviews about this product before I spent $250.00 on it and all the reviews were great until I bought it and now I am so glad I sent it back.  It was a total waste of money and my time even using the vacuume.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grs</title>
		<link>http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum/comment-page-1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>grs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I purchased this product after reading &quot;rave&quot; reviews about the efficiency and ease of the machine.  I will agree that the windtunnel is equipped with powerful suction, but I have a tri-level house and it is not an easy machine to use on stairs.  Unfortunately, the MAIN reason I bought this product is because so many people commented how easy it was for vacuuming stairs.  
&lt;br /&gt;The other down side to this product is that it is bagless.  I thought I would be OK with seeing my own dirt but it is rather disgusting to clean out.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased this product after reading &#8220;rave&#8221; reviews about the efficiency and ease of the machine.  I will agree that the windtunnel is equipped with powerful suction, but I have a tri-level house and it is not an easy machine to use on stairs.  Unfortunately, the MAIN reason I bought this product is because so many people commented how easy it was for vacuuming stairs.<br />
<br />The other down side to this product is that it is bagless.  I thought I would be OK with seeing my own dirt but it is rather disgusting to clean out.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum#comment-48</guid>
		<description>So I bought this vacuum and overall wasnt happy. It didnt pick up anything. I mean I dont know what people are talking about here. It makes me think I got a defective one or something because mine really was weak where suction was concerned. I took it back and after doing ALOT of online research I went with a Dyson, DC17 Animal-ABsolute. Let me tell you what, this thing is amazing! Picks up stuff from the neighbors carpets its so strong! I would highly reccomned not getting this Hoover but instead if youre looking for a slightly more expensive vacuum you go all the way and get the Dyson. ANY Dyson for that matter. It just doesnt get any better than Dyson and with the 5 year vacuum, you are protected against any problems.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I bought this vacuum and overall wasnt happy. It didnt pick up anything. I mean I dont know what people are talking about here. It makes me think I got a defective one or something because mine really was weak where suction was concerned. I took it back and after doing ALOT of online research I went with a Dyson, DC17 Animal-ABsolute. Let me tell you what, this thing is amazing! Picks up stuff from the neighbors carpets its so strong! I would highly reccomned not getting this Hoover but instead if youre looking for a slightly more expensive vacuum you go all the way and get the Dyson. ANY Dyson for that matter. It just doesnt get any better than Dyson and with the 5 year vacuum, you are protected against any problems.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Tough</title>
		<link>http://www.sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Tough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonothrombolysis2008.com/hoover-s3765-040-windtunnel-electronic-bagless-canister-vacuum#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I read all the reviews I could find and finally settled on the WindTunnel Bagless, I was a little cautious about the bagless concept and about the comments about the handle being weak.  Well the vacuum is great, love the bagless, but I do agree with the other reviewers the handle is weak and doesn&#039;t stand up on its own very well. Overall I am very pleased though.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read all the reviews I could find and finally settled on the WindTunnel Bagless, I was a little cautious about the bagless concept and about the comments about the handle being weak.  Well the vacuum is great, love the bagless, but I do agree with the other reviewers the handle is weak and doesn&#8217;t stand up on its own very well. Overall I am very pleased though.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

